Skip to main content
Sister Publication Links
  • Automotive News
  • Rubber News
  • European Rubber Journal
Subscribe
  • Login
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • Current Issue
  • BEST PLACES TO WORK
  • News
    • MID YEAR REPORT
    • TIRE MAKERS
    • HUMANITARIAN
    • COMMERCIAL TIRE
    • GOVERNMENT & LAW
    • MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS
    • OBITUARIES
    • OPINION
    • SERVICE ZONE
  • ADAS
  • Data
    • DATA STORE
  • Custom
    • SPONSORED CONTENT
  • Events
    • ASK THE EXPERT
    • LIVESTREAMS
    • WEBINARS
    • SEMA LIVESTREAMS
    • RUBBER NEWS EVENTS
  • Resources
    • ADVERTISE
    • AWARDS
    • CLASSIFIEDS
    • DIRECTORY
    • SHOP FLOOR
    • Best Places to Work
    • BALANCING
    • DEMOUNTING
    • SAFETY
    • TIRE REPAIR
    • TPMS
    • TRAINING
    • VEHICLE LIFTING
    • WHEEL TORQUE
  • DIGITAL EDITION
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Editorial
June 08, 2021 12:30 PM

Our View: What impact does branding have on price?

  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Print

    The pending antidumping duties case covering imports of passenger and light truck tires from South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand and Vietnam boils down to a fundamentally different interpretation of available market data: What impact does branding have on pricing?

    In its argument for duties, the United Steelworkers (USW) union claims that the "subject imports" increased their share of the domestic market for P/LT tires by 5.3 percentage points during the period of investigation, in large part because such products "undersold the domestic-like product about 90% of the time."

    Underselling at significant margins was "nearly universal in all products," the USW contends, "covering tires from all countries and regardless of whether the imports and domestic product were branded or private label."

    This underselling permitted imports to take market share from domestic producers and drive down domestic prices in most of the pricing products, the USW claims.

    The union's position ignores the role of branding in the marketplace — a stance pointed out by nearly every individual testifying against the imposition of duties during the International Trade Commission hearing on May 25.

    Sumitomo Rubber North America Inc.'s (SRNA) Richard Smallwood summed it up perhaps most succinctly:

    "The U.S. tire market is in a state of constant and accelerating transition, and producers in the U.S. do not have the capacity or production flexibility to fully and profitably service all market segments.

    "This is not a problem caused by the subject imports, and they should not be punished for supplying tires that the market needs."

    Mr. Smallwood and others pointed out repeatedly that tire makers with capacity in the U.S. — including his own — have prioritized their investments in their domestic production on high-value-added products, primarily those of 18-inch rim diameters and larger, and tires for the growing light truck/SUV/CUV market segments.

    In our Mid-Year Tire Report, SRNA said its $122 million, three-year expansion of its plant in Tonawanda, N.Y., is proceeding as scheduled. The expansion will more than double capacity at that plant for P/LT product lines.

    The investment also includes additional building machinery that the company said will serve the burgeoning need for light truck and CUV product lines.

    And Bridgestone, Continental, Hankook, Pirelli, Toyo, Nokian and others continue to ramp up capacity at their North American plants to address supply issues.

    This investment strategy has meant capacities for smaller-rim-diameter tires and/or private-branding has largely been phased out or is being phased out.

    Michael Matthis, president of Atturo Tire Corp., underscored this situation in his testimony, calling attention to the USW's "deceptive position" that "dimensionally similar tires are interchangeable."

    He added: "There is virtually no domestic availability of private-brand tires," which forced Atturo and other private-brand marketers to look overseas for supply.

    It's an interesting conundrum: the USW argues U.S.-made products were undersold as manufacturers race to make more domestic products to sell.

    Related Article
    Stakes high as final ruling on Asia import duties looms
    Hankook, Sumitomo oppose duties on Asian-sourced tires
    ITC ruling on P/LT tire antidumping cases due in June
    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Do you have an opinion about this story? Do you have some thoughts you'd like to share with our readers? Tire Business would love to hear from you. Email your letter to Editor Don Detore at [email protected].

    Most Popular
    1
    Fire at Poland plant will cut Goodyear sales by up to $40M
    2
    Canada court rules for Michelin in tire trademark case
    3
    Iowa dealer victim in grisly murder
    4
    Goodyear to cut jobs, divest Asia-Pacific locations
    5
    Tire Business ranks the Top 75 Tire Makers of 2023
    SIGN UP FOR NEWSLETTERS
    EMAIL ADDRESS

    Please enter a valid email address.

    Please enter your email address.

    Please verify captcha.

    Please select at least one newsletter to subscribe.

    Newsletter Center

    Staying current is easy with Tire Business delivered straight to your inbox.

    SUBSCRIBE TODAY

    Subscribe to Tire Business

    SUBSCRIBE
    Connect with Us
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • RSS

    Our Mission

    Tire Business is an award-winning publication dedicated to providing the latest news, data and insights into the tire and automotive service industries.

    Reader Services
    • Staff
    • About Us
    • Site Map
    • Industry Sites
    • Order Reprints
    • Customer Service: 877-320-1716
    Partner Sites
    • Rubber News
    • European Rubber Journal
    • Automotive News
    • Plastics News
    • Urethanes Technology
    RESOURCES
    • Advertise
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    • Terms of Service
    • Media Guide
    • Editorial Calendar
    • Classified Rates
    • Digital Edition
    • Careers
    • Ad Choices
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • BEST PLACES TO WORK
    • News
      • MID YEAR REPORT
      • TIRE MAKERS
      • HUMANITARIAN
      • COMMERCIAL TIRE
      • GOVERNMENT & LAW
      • MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS
      • OBITUARIES
      • OPINION
      • SERVICE ZONE
    • ADAS
    • Data
      • DATA STORE
    • Custom
      • SPONSORED CONTENT
    • Events
      • ASK THE EXPERT
      • LIVESTREAMS
      • WEBINARS
      • SEMA LIVESTREAMS
      • RUBBER NEWS EVENTS
    • Resources
      • ADVERTISE
      • AWARDS
        • Best Places to Work
      • CLASSIFIEDS
      • DIRECTORY
      • SHOP FLOOR
        • BALANCING
        • DEMOUNTING
        • SAFETY
        • TIRE REPAIR
        • TPMS
        • TRAINING
        • VEHICLE LIFTING
        • WHEEL TORQUE
    • DIGITAL EDITION