Skip to main content
Sister Publication Links
  • Rubber News
  • European Rubber Journal
Subscribe
  • Login
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • Current Issue
  • BEST PLACES TO WORK
  • News
    • HUMANITARIAN
    • TIRE MAKERS
    • COMMERCIAL TIRE
    • GOVERNMENT & LAW
    • MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS
    • OBITUARIES
    • OPINION
    • MID YEAR REPORT
    • SERVICE ZONE
  • ADAS
  • Data
    • DATA STORE
  • Custom
    • SPONSORED CONTENT
  • Resources
    • Events
    • DIRECTORY
    • CLASSIFIEDS
    • SHOP FLOOR
    • AWARDS
    • ASK THE EXPERT
    • LIVESTREAMS
    • WEBINARS
    • SEMA LIVESTREAMS
    • RUBBER NEWS EVENTS
    • BALANCING
    • DEMOUNTING
    • SAFETY
    • TIRE REPAIR
    • TPMS
    • TRAINING
    • VEHICLE LIFTING
    • WHEEL TORQUE
    • Best Places to Work
  • ADVERTISE
  • DIGITAL EDITION
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. News
March 13, 2018 02:00 AM

Virginia jury issues $37.8 million verdict against Hankook

Tire Business Staff
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Print

    RICHMOND, Va. — A federal jury in Virginia has levied a verdict of $37.8 million against Hankook Tire Co. Ltd. and Hankook Tire America Corp., finding the tire maker liable for an accident that rendered the plaintiff paraplegic.

    The jury before the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia handed down the verdict March 9.

    According to the amended complaint filed July 12, the accident occurred Nov. 14, 2014. Robert Benedict was driving a 2007 Kenworth T800 Cement Mixer Truck on Route 288 near Iron Bridge Road in Richmond.

    The right front steer tire, a Hankook Aurora TH08 Radial size 425/65 R22.5, allegedly lost its tread and outer steel belt, causing the truck to hit an embankment and roll over, the complaint said. Mr. Benedict suffered a spinal cord injury that left him paraplegic, it said.

    The complaint alleged that the Hankook Aurora tire had insufficient halobutyl in its inner liner compound to prevent oxygen from leaking into other components of the tire, weakening those components and leading to the tread and belt separation.

    It also alleged that the manufacturing process Hankook used resulted in inadequate bonding of the tread to the carcass.

    In its answer to the complaint, Hankook denied that the tire was defective. It said the tire met or exceeded all applicable federal safety standards, and that Mr. Benedict failed to take proper care of the tire.

    In a prepared statement, Hankook said it “respectfully but strongly” disagreed with the jury verdict.

    “While our thoughts are with Mr. Benedict, we remain confident in the quality of our tires and maintain that no manufacturing defects played a role in this tragic accident,” Hankook said. “We are weighing potential next steps in this case.”

    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Do you have an opinion about this story? Do you have some thoughts you'd like to share with our readers? Tire Business would love to hear from you. Email your letter to Editor Don Detore at [email protected].

    Most Popular
    1
    Hankook Tire confirms arrest of Chairman Cho Hyun-bum
    2
    Is rise of remote workers hurting tire sales?
    3
    Michelin to launch BFG-brand heavy-duty light-truck tire
    4
    TB report: 3PMS tires vary in winter weather
    5
    Michelin, Pirelli top OE brands with new buyers
    SIGN UP FOR NEWSLETTERS
    EMAIL ADDRESS

    Please enter a valid email address.

    Please enter your email address.

    Please verify captcha.

    Please select at least one newsletter to subscribe.

    Newsletter Center

    Staying current is easy with Tire Business delivered straight to your inbox.

    SUBSCRIBE TODAY

    Subscribe to Tire Business

    SUBSCRIBE
    Connect with Us
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • RSS

    Our Mission

    Tire Business is an award-winning publication dedicated to providing the latest news, data and insights into the tire and automotive service industries.

    Reader Services
    • Staff
    • About Us
    • Site Map
    • Industry Sites
    • Order Reprints
    • Customer Service: 877-320-1716
    Partner Sites
    • Rubber News
    • European Rubber Journal
    • Automotive News
    • Plastics News
    • Urethanes Technology
    RESOURCES
    • Advertise
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    • Terms of Service
    • Media Guide
    • Editorial Calendar
    • Classified Rates
    • Digital Edition
    • Careers
    • Ad Choices Ad Choices
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • BEST PLACES TO WORK
    • News
      • HUMANITARIAN
      • TIRE MAKERS
      • COMMERCIAL TIRE
      • GOVERNMENT & LAW
      • MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS
      • OBITUARIES
      • OPINION
      • MID YEAR REPORT
      • SERVICE ZONE
    • ADAS
    • Data
      • DATA STORE
    • Custom
      • SPONSORED CONTENT
    • Resources
      • Events
        • ASK THE EXPERT
        • LIVESTREAMS
        • WEBINARS
        • SEMA LIVESTREAMS
        • RUBBER NEWS EVENTS
      • DIRECTORY
      • CLASSIFIEDS
      • SHOP FLOOR
        • BALANCING
        • DEMOUNTING
        • SAFETY
        • TIRE REPAIR
        • TPMS
        • TRAINING
        • VEHICLE LIFTING
        • WHEEL TORQUE
      • AWARDS
        • Best Places to Work
    • ADVERTISE
    • DIGITAL EDITION