Skip to main content
Sister Publication Links
  • Automotive News
  • Rubber News
  • European Rubber Journal
Subscribe
  • Login
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • Current Issue
  • HUMANITARIAN
  • News
    • TIRE MAKERS
    • COMMERCIAL TIRE
    • GOVERNMENT & LAW
    • MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS
    • BEST PLACES TO WORK
    • OBITUARIES
    • OPINION
    • MID YEAR REPORT
    • SERVICE ZONE
  • ADAS
  • Data
    • DATA STORE
  • Custom
    • SPONSORED CONTENT
  • Resources
    • Events
    • DIRECTORY
    • CLASSIFIEDS
    • SHOP FLOOR
    • AWARDS
    • ASK THE EXPERT
    • LIVESTREAMS
    • WEBINARS
    • SEMA LIVESTREAMS
    • RUBBER NEWS EVENTS
    • BALANCING
    • DEMOUNTING
    • SAFETY
    • TIRE REPAIR
    • TPMS
    • TRAINING
    • VEHICLE LIFTING
    • WHEEL TORQUE
    • Best Places to Work
  • ADVERTISE
  • DIGITAL EDITION
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. News
October 27, 2014 02:00 AM

NHTSA back in cross hairs as airbag crisis escalates

Crain News Service
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Print
    (Crain News Service photo)

    By Nick Bunkley, Crain News Service

    WASHINGTON (Oct. 27, 2014) — For the second time this year, a long-standing defect linked to deaths and injuries has triggered a mushrooming auto-safety crisis, lending more fuel to criticism that federal regulators haven't done enough to protect consumers from such dangers.

    Ten auto makers have issued recalls for millions of airbags that, rather than save drivers and passengers in a crash, can explode with a lethal spray of jagged metal.

    The flaw is connected to two deaths in what were otherwise fender benders, and two others may be related. Just this month, a Florida woman died with such unexpectedly severe gashes in her neck after a crash that police reportedly suspected homicide — until a recall notice for the vehicle arrived the following week.

    Perhaps most unnerving to consumers, the problem doesn't yet appear to be contained. On Wednesday, Oct. 22, two auto makers told Automotive News that they couldn't say for sure whether all of the bad airbags had been identified. The next morning, one of them, Nissan Motor Corp., expanded its list by 260,000 vehicles globally, though none of the additions are in the U.S.

    “The thing just keeps expanding,” said Karl Brauer, senior analyst with Kelley Blue Book. “The year span gets wider; the list of makes and models keeps getting longer.”

    There have been few concrete answers about the scope of the problem from the airbag supplier, Takata Corp. of Japan. And after new data showed that the airbags posed a greater danger than previously believed, U.S. regulators at the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) bungled attempts to raise awareness of the problem by understating the number of vehicles affected by more than 3 million; releasing incorrect lists of which makes and models are problematic; and referring consumers to a website that stopped functioning for days.

    After watching the agency she ran in the 1970s stagger last week, former NHTSA Administrator Joan Claybrook put it bluntly: “I think they're having a meltdown.”

    Bloomberg News reported late Oct. 24 that NHTSA's errors and overall “safety culture” were under review by a special team inside the Department of Transportation. The report cited a senior Obama administration official who requested anonymity.

    Despite the gruesome nature of the defect, NHTSA agreed not to require official recalls for many of the airbags. That has allowed auto makers to use less formal notification processes and to largely exclude all but a handful of states and U.S. territories where Takata says high humidity can make its inflators dangerously explosive.

    The situation has, in many ways, mirrored the crisis that confronted General Motors Co. earlier this year but on an even larger scale because of the number of auto makers and vehicles involved. The U.S. Attorney's Office in Manhattan, which also is probing the GM ignition-switch recall, has begun a similar investigation into Takata, sources told the Wall Street Journal, and the two congressional committees that conducted hearings with GM and NHTSA officials said they are seeking explanations from NHTSA on Takata.

    Also, as in the GM case, NHTSA so far has refused to exert its full regulatory power with Takata as it awaits additional data to confirm whether the airbags do, in fact, constitute a safety defect.

    But whereas GM said its testing concluded that unrepaired vehicles were safe if driven with nothing attached to the ignition key, there appears to be no way — short of avoiding a crash before getting the airbag replaced — for customers affected by the Takata actions to ensure their safety.

    ‘Field actions' vs. recalls

    Takata has wrestled with airbag defects for several years, but the current debacle can be traced to May 20. That was when officials from Takata and NHTSA met to discuss several instances of Takata airbag ruptures in vehicles not covered by previous recalls.

    Takata pointed to a common thread: All six “potentially relevant” incidents occurred in Puerto Rico and Florida. The company said its investigation was focused on whether prolonged exposure to humid climates combined with “potential processing issues” that occurred at Takata factories made its airbag inflators dangerous, according to a June 11 Takata letter to NHTSA.

    The two sides agreed to work together to determine whether the issue amounted to a safety defect in millions more vehicles still on the road. Under their agreement, auto makers would conduct a series of regional “field actions” to replace the questionable airbags. These actions would apply only to high-humidity areas believed to present the highest risk: Florida, Hawaii, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Airbags collected from customers would then be tested to inform investigations into the issue.

    In a statement issued at the time, Takata said: “We have been consistently cooperating with NHTSA, and we will continue to do so during the defect investigation that the agency recently opened, but we also stand by the quality of our products.”

     

    Takata, BMW, Chrysler, Ford, Honda, Mazda, Nissan and Toyota agreed to the plan and announced their field actions in June and July. Mitsubishi and Subaru joined soon afterward.

    Yet while the field actions are similar in effect to an official recall, they differ in a few ways. For example, they have less-stringent rules for how auto makers must notify customers and report to regulators how many vehicles have been fixed. And with the field actions, manufacturers don't have to officially acknowledge that a defect exists, as they would with an official recall.

    “I am flummoxed by this,” Ms. Claybrook said, dismissing the regional tack as a cost-saving maneuver. “This is not a regulatory agency; it's an auto industry booster agency.”

    Ms. Claybrook said that such regional actions in the past primarily have been used to fix relatively minor issues that present a low safety risk, are small in number and expected to occur only in limited areas — such as corrosion due to heavy use of road salt.

    Sens. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., and Ed Markey, D-Mass., two of the most vocal lawmakers during the inquiry into the GM switch case, recently criticized auto makers' use of regional actions and last week implored regulators to do more.

    “NHTSA should immediately issue a nationwide safety recall on all the affected cars, regardless of where the car is registered,” the duo wrote to Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx. “We have become increasingly troubled and alarmed by the confusing and conflicting advice being issued by NHTSA and the glacial pace of the agency's response to this public safety threat.”

    Mix-ups at NHTSA

    The field actions have been the source of much of the recent confusion and made it difficult to get a firm grip on how many vehicles are affected. With Honda, for example, vehicles with the same nameplate and model year have been subject to national campaigns in some cases, and regional campaigns in others, depending on when or where they were produced.

    NHTSA's first warning last week said some 4.7 million U.S. vehicles were covered by the regional actions. It later revised the number to 6.1 million, then 7.8 million. Its original list erroneously included 14 GM nameplates that used a different airbag supplier; just two GM vehicles were on the corrected list, both built by other manufacturers.

    Inconsistent messages from the auto makers caught up in the recalls have furthered the confusion. Toyota and GM say people should avoid sitting in the front passenger seat of affected vehicles until repairs can be made, but others have declined to go that far. Toyota also said its dealers would disable the airbags if parts were unavailable, an unusual step for which it had to get regulatory approval.

    (Crain News Service photo)

    David Friedman

    NHTSA's top official, Deputy Administrator David Friedman, apologized for mistakes in its communication efforts last week but insisted the agency has handled the actual recall process properly, while it continues to investigate.

    Mr. Friedman said the agency has “identified the problem” affecting Takata airbags and is making sure cars are recalled in parts of the country “where there is a demonstrated risk.”

    Among the vehicles recalled are about 877,000 Toyotas, including 28,515 that Toyota announced recalls for in humid regions on Oct. 20. Toyota spokeswoman Cindy Knight said the company was confident it was acting appropriately based on the information available, but she acknowledged that the numbers could grow further.

    Nissan spokesman Steve Yaeger said that so far, just 15 percent of vehicles that Nissan has recalled on a national basis for the faulty airbags have been repaired.

    Nissan already has sent letters to all customers affected by the recalls and plans to mail a reminder in November, he said. For vehicles recalled on a regional basis, he said, Nissan followed NHTSA's recommendations for which ZIP codes to include.

    “If Takata provides additional information to us and to NHTSA, we're always going to look at that,” Mr. Yaeger said.

    Nissan hasn't had a shortage of replacement parts, he added, so it isn't telling customers to avoid using the front passenger seat or instructing dealers to disable airbags.

    Toyota said its parts supplies are increasing but still insufficient, so it decided to have dealers disable the passenger-side airbag as a temporary measure. In conjunction with that, dealers will leave a hangtag on the glove box warning that the passenger seat should not be occupied. All other airbags will function normally, Toyota said.

    ____________________________________________________--

    This report appeared on autonews.com, the website of Automotive News, a Detroit-based sister publication of Tire Business.

    Related Articles
    Takata accused in lawsuit of burying bad airbag test results
    Airbag inflator shortage plagues industry
    Honda admits under-reporting serious U.S. accidents since 2003
    Takata poised for clash in Congress after rejecting U.S. recall
    Auto makers gather today to coordinate Takata airbag testing
    Takata CEO takes out newspaper ads in reaction to airbag crisis
    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Do you have an opinion about this story? Do you have some thoughts you'd like to share with our readers? Tire Business would love to hear from you. Email your letter to Editor Don Detore at [email protected].

    Most Popular
    1
    Update: Goodyear agrees to meet investment group
    2
    Mavis acquiring TBC's NTB, Tire Kingdom business
    3
    Mavis-TBC deal tops retail tire charts
    4
    Mavis-TBC deal shakes up retail landscape
    5
    Wave of M&As gathering strength
    SIGN UP FOR NEWSLETTERS
    EMAIL ADDRESS

    Please enter a valid email address.

    Please enter your email address.

    Please verify captcha.

    Please select at least one newsletter to subscribe.

    Newsletter Center

    Staying current is easy with Tire Business delivered straight to your inbox.

    SUBSCRIBE TODAY

    Subscribe to Tire Business

    SUBSCRIBE
    Connect with Us
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • RSS

    Our Mission

    Tire Business is an award-winning publication dedicated to providing the latest news, data and insights into the tire and automotive service industries.

    Reader Services
    • Staff
    • About Us
    • Site Map
    • Industry Sites
    • Order Reprints
    • Customer Service: 877-320-1716
    Partner Sites
    • Rubber News
    • European Rubber Journal
    • Automotive News
    • Plastics News
    • Urethanes Technology
    RESOURCES
    • Advertise
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    • Terms of Service
    • Media Guide
    • Editorial Calendar
    • Classified Rates
    • Digital Edition
    • Careers
    • Ad Choices Ad Choices
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • HUMANITARIAN
    • News
      • TIRE MAKERS
      • COMMERCIAL TIRE
      • GOVERNMENT & LAW
      • MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS
      • BEST PLACES TO WORK
      • OBITUARIES
      • OPINION
      • MID YEAR REPORT
      • SERVICE ZONE
    • ADAS
    • Data
      • DATA STORE
    • Custom
      • SPONSORED CONTENT
    • Resources
      • Events
        • ASK THE EXPERT
        • LIVESTREAMS
        • WEBINARS
        • SEMA LIVESTREAMS
        • RUBBER NEWS EVENTS
      • DIRECTORY
      • CLASSIFIEDS
      • SHOP FLOOR
        • BALANCING
        • DEMOUNTING
        • SAFETY
        • TIRE REPAIR
        • TPMS
        • TRAINING
        • VEHICLE LIFTING
        • WHEEL TORQUE
      • AWARDS
        • Best Places to Work
    • ADVERTISE
    • DIGITAL EDITION