Skip to main content
Sister Publication Links
  • Automotive News
  • Rubber News
  • European Rubber Journal
Subscribe
  • Login
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • Current Issue
  • BEST PLACES TO WORK
  • News
    • MID YEAR REPORT
    • TIRE MAKERS
    • HUMANITARIAN
    • COMMERCIAL TIRE
    • GOVERNMENT & LAW
    • MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS
    • OBITUARIES
    • OPINION
    • SERVICE ZONE
  • ADAS
  • Data
    • DATA STORE
  • Custom
    • SPONSORED CONTENT
  • Events
    • ASK THE EXPERT
    • LIVESTREAMS
    • WEBINARS
    • SEMA LIVESTREAMS
    • RUBBER NEWS EVENTS
  • Resources
    • ADVERTISE
    • AWARDS
    • CLASSIFIEDS
    • DIRECTORY
    • SHOP FLOOR
    • Best Places to Work
    • BALANCING
    • DEMOUNTING
    • SAFETY
    • TIRE REPAIR
    • TPMS
    • TRAINING
    • VEHICLE LIFTING
    • WHEEL TORQUE
  • DIGITAL EDITION
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. News
February 14, 2014 01:00 AM

GM alters language in purchasing contract

  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Print

    By Mike Colias, Crain News Service

    DETROIT (Feb. 14, 2013) — General Motors Co. is rolling back controversial changes it made last year to its purchasing contract, including new terms that some suppliers believed exposed them to greater warranty liability.

    Last July, GM rolled out the biggest overhaul to its supplier contract framework in 20 years. Some suppliers and their attorneys interpreted the new terms and conditions as giving GM far broader authority to recover warranty and safety-recall costs, to take over suppliers' intellectual property rights and to access their financial information.

    GM global purchasing chief Grace Lieblein told Automotive News recently that the contract changes “left a lot of room for interpretation,” leading some suppliers to think the worst of GM's intentions.

    “The language was getting interpreted differently from our business intent,” Ms. Lieblein said.

    Ms. Lieblein said she decided to strike the most controversial elements from the contract after months of hearing concerns from supplier CEOs and their attorneys.

    “I don't want to be talking to CEOs about terms and conditions,” she said. “I want to be talking to them about technology and quality and driving waste from the system to go after cost.”

    GM declined to provide a copy of the new contract to Automotive News. However, a GM spokesman outlined the main changes:

    • Eliminating a sentence that said suppliers' parts will “not, at any time (including after expiration or termination of this contract), pose an unreasonable risk to consumer or vehicle safety.” Many suppliers and their attorneys interpreted that as creating an open-ended liability, beyond the usual warranty on supplier parts, which generally expires at the same time as GM's consumer product warranty.

    • Clarifying that GM's “audit rights”—the auto maker's right to access a supplier's books—are limited to business between GM and the supplier. The 2013 contract language had left the impression that GM wanted broad access to suppliers' income statements, balance sheets and other proprietary information. Some suppliers feared GM could use that information to demand price cuts.

    • Deleting a provision that required suppliers to ensure uninterrupted supply during “any foreseeable or anticipated event” whereas the old contract applied only to labor disruptions. Some suppliers worried that this language would leave them responsible for flagging problems at an upstream supplier, for example.

    • Clarifying a provision that grants GM license to a supplier's intellectual property only during limited periods when the supplier isn't able to ship products. Suppliers said that the terms enacted last summer posed a broader risk to their intellectual property rights.

    The vehicle maker revised the contract last year partly to conform with the terms and conditions used by PSA/Peugeot-Citroen, GM's partner in a joint-purchasing venture created in 2012. GM also thought the update was overdue because its contract had not been revised in about 20 years.

    The new terms and conditions applied only to new purchase contracts. A GM spokesman said few, if any, suppliers chose not to do business with GM because of the concerns. But Ms. Lieblein said the feedback from supplier executives and attorneys made clear that they were uncomfortable with elements of the new contract.

    “To stay with terms and conditions when we knew there was significant concern and a lot of variation and interpretation didn't feel consistent with the relationships the we're trying to build,” she said.

    Ms. Lieblein said the latest revisions were made with the help of GM's supplier council, a group of about a dozen CEOs and other executives from GM suppliers of various sizes.

    ______________________________________

    This report appeared on autonews.com, the website of Automotive News, a Detroit-based sister publication of Tire Business.

    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Do you have an opinion about this story? Do you have some thoughts you'd like to share with our readers? Tire Business would love to hear from you. Email your letter to Editor Don Detore at [email protected].

    Most Popular
    1
    Goodyear tabs distributors for Australia, New Zealand
    2
    Goodyear to cut jobs, divest Asia-Pacific locations
    3
    Tire Business ranks the Top 75 Tire Makers of 2023
    4
    Goodyear adds DuraTrac RT to Wrangler LT tire lineup
    5
    Key issues of UAW strike on Ford, GM and Stellantis
    SIGN UP FOR NEWSLETTERS
    EMAIL ADDRESS

    Please enter a valid email address.

    Please enter your email address.

    Please verify captcha.

    Please select at least one newsletter to subscribe.

    Newsletter Center

    Staying current is easy with Tire Business delivered straight to your inbox.

    SUBSCRIBE TODAY

    Subscribe to Tire Business

    SUBSCRIBE
    Connect with Us
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • RSS

    Our Mission

    Tire Business is an award-winning publication dedicated to providing the latest news, data and insights into the tire and automotive service industries.

    Reader Services
    • Staff
    • About Us
    • Site Map
    • Industry Sites
    • Order Reprints
    • Customer Service: 877-320-1716
    Partner Sites
    • Rubber News
    • European Rubber Journal
    • Automotive News
    • Plastics News
    • Urethanes Technology
    RESOURCES
    • Advertise
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    • Terms of Service
    • Media Guide
    • Editorial Calendar
    • Classified Rates
    • Digital Edition
    • Careers
    • Ad Choices
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • BEST PLACES TO WORK
    • News
      • MID YEAR REPORT
      • TIRE MAKERS
      • HUMANITARIAN
      • COMMERCIAL TIRE
      • GOVERNMENT & LAW
      • MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS
      • OBITUARIES
      • OPINION
      • SERVICE ZONE
    • ADAS
    • Data
      • DATA STORE
    • Custom
      • SPONSORED CONTENT
    • Events
      • ASK THE EXPERT
      • LIVESTREAMS
      • WEBINARS
      • SEMA LIVESTREAMS
      • RUBBER NEWS EVENTS
    • Resources
      • ADVERTISE
      • AWARDS
        • Best Places to Work
      • CLASSIFIEDS
      • DIRECTORY
      • SHOP FLOOR
        • BALANCING
        • DEMOUNTING
        • SAFETY
        • TIRE REPAIR
        • TPMS
        • TRAINING
        • VEHICLE LIFTING
        • WHEEL TORQUE
    • DIGITAL EDITION