By Ana Radelat, Crain News Service
NEW YORK (Aug. 13, 2013) — The threat is more a specter right now than a real danger, but advertising industry lobbyists are treating the possibility Congress could eliminate or curtail the expensing of advertising fees as a looming Armageddon.
Dan Jaffe, top lobbyist for the Association of National Advertisers (ANA), said that there are proposals under consideration in both the House and Senate that would affect the ability of businesses to expense advertising fees for tax purposes. Mr. Jaffe said a prevalent idea is to allow a business to expense advertising costs—but not fully in the year the expense is incurred, but instead, over a number of years.
"The only rational thing for the advertising community is to keep its guard up." — Dan Jaffe, top lobbyist for the Association of National Advertisers
Ending the ability to expense advertising costs would be "counterproductive" for the U.S. Treasury, said Mr. Jaffe, because businesses would advertise less, make less money and pay fewer taxes.
Heated fight
There's a heated partisan fight over changing the tax code and no proposal about advertising expenses on paper, yet Mr. Jaffe and other industry representatives have begun lobbying lawmakers and asking advertisers to help. "The only rational thing for the advertising community is to keep its guard up," he said.
The House Ways and Means Committee, headed by Republican Rep. Dave Camp of Michigan, and the Senate Finance Committee, headed by Democratic Sen. Max Baucus of Montana, are trying to find a way to overhaul the federal tax code.
Everyone wants to consider closing tax loopholes. But a seemingly unbridgeable chasm exists between Democrats who want the reforms to raise revenue and Republicans who want reforms to be "revenue neutral." That means any gains the U.S. Treasury would receive by closing loopholes would be used to lower the tax rate on corporations, and perhaps high-income earners.
Just before Congress left for August recess, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said a rewrite of the tax code must be conducted "under the total understanding that it can't be revenue-neutral. It can't be even close to revenue-neutral. There has to be significant new revenues." He'd start with about $1 trillion.
Battening down the hatches
To some, Senator Reid's statement made it clear there would be no tax reform this year. But Mr. Jaffe said the ANA is "lobbying heavily" because other interest groups are doing so too, asking lawmakers to protect their tax breaks and eliminate others instead.
"We are battening down our hatches but we hope we do not have to fire our guns," he said.
The move by Rep. Rosa DeLauro, D-Conn., to end the expensing of costs associated with advertising "unhealthy" food to children is an indication Congress, or at least some lawmakers, will zero in on advertising expenses, Mr. Jaffe warned.
"Taxpayers should not continue to subsidize a tax loophole that allows companies to deduct expenses for marketing unhealthy foods to kids," said Ms. DeLauro when she introduced her bill last month. Sen. John Rockefeller, D-W.Va., is expected to introduce a similar bill in the Senate.
AAF on alert
Clark Rector, chief lobbyist for the American Advertising Federation (AAF), sent the organization's members a "government alert" that said plans are afoot in Congress to consider the amortization of advertising costs and urging them to contact their senators and representatives. He advised them to vote "against any measure that would alter or deny the current law that permits a business to deduct the full cost of advertising in the year it is incurred."
He noted that the U.S. tax code has treated advertising as "an ordinary and necessary expense of doing business" for 100 years.
Mr. Rector said there's no formal proposal about adverting expenses but, like Mr. Jaffe, he wants to be vigilant.
"It may be a long shot, but crazy things have happened" in Washington," Mr. Jaffe said.
This report appeared in Advertising Age magazine, a New York City-based sister publication of Tire Business.
