Crain News Service report
AKRON (July 14, 2014) — Roy Armes, chairman and CEO at Cooper Tire & Rubber Co., doesn’t like the term “rebound” used in reference to what his company is accomplishing.
Perhaps he’d prefer the phrase “moving forward.”
But whatever the language chosen, the Findlay, Ohio-based tire maker clearly is leaving behind last year’s failed merger with India’s Apollo Tyres Ltd.
Halfway through 2014, things clearly are looking up for Cooper. The company, which posted 2013 sales of $3.44 billion, has its long-term sights set on boosting that to between $5 billion and $6 billion, with an operating margin of 10 percent.
One key aspect is Cooper’s emphasis on technology and research and development. A couple of decades back, the tire manufacturer had a reputation as a firm that waited for competitors to push forward tire development, and then quickly followed suit with similar products of its own. While not quite a copy cat method of R&D, it didn’t cost Cooper nearly as much as the trailblazers were spending.
Clearly, this is a different Cooper when it comes to technology. In June, Cooper Tire Asia relocated its Shanghai technical operation to a 54,000-sq.-ft. facility near its Kunshan, China, tire factory. That R&D center will boast a staff of 65 scientists and tire engineers.
Now Cooper is going forward with plans for its new $35.5 million Global Technical Center to be located at its headquarters in Findlay. The project was first announced in early 2013 but was put on hold during the Apollo merger talks. The company said the R&D showcase will be operating by year-end and eventually be the home to a technical staff of 40.
At the festivities to announce the investment, Mr. Armes and Chuck Yurkovich, vice president, global research and development at Cooper, talked about how the company has been working on boosting its technical capabilities in recent years. Mr. Yurkovich said Cooper will focus on technological leadership, leveraging its R&D globally and creating customer value.
These are the type of moves Cooper needs to make to forge its own path to the future—whether you call it a rebound or not.
This editorial recently appeared in Rubber & Plastics News, an Akron-based sister publication of Tire Business.
Titan International and the United Steelworkers union have petitioned the U.S. International Trade Commission and U.S. Department of Commerce seeking relief from OTR tire imports from China, India and Sri Lanka. What’s your opinion?
|I wholeheartedly support their action – something needs to be done.||
|I think it’s a bad idea that could inevitably tie the hands of domestic tire makers.||
|I oppose any duties against tire importers—they only raise costs for distributors and make it harder to obtain inventory.||
|I’m kind of on the fence and not sure what’s right, but need more information before deciding.||
|I don’t really care whether or not relief is granted.||
|Total votes: 78|