WASHINGTON (May 30, 2014) — Kia Motors Corp.’s technical bulletin warning Kia owners not to use non-original equipment oil filters is a clear violation of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (MMWA), four major auto aftermarket associations have told the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).
The complaint is two years old, but the associations—the Auto Care Association, the Tire Industry Association, the Automotive Oil Change Association and the Service Station Dealers of America and Allied Trades—renewed their protest publicly after Consumer Reports (CR) magazine referenced the Kia bulletin in a recent article.
In that bulletin, the auto maker recommends that Kia owners either have their oil changed at Kia dealerships or insist on Kia oil filters to avoid problems with oil- and filter-related warranty claims.
Because of the Kia bulletin, Consumer Reports is recommending that Kia owners avoid independent repair shops and non-Kia filters, which directly contradicts the consumer options codified in MMWA, the four associations said in a May 27, 2014, letter renewing their complaint against Kia.
Under MMWA, the associations said, “the manufacturer must first ‘show that the aftermarket or recycled part caused the need for repairs before denying warranty coverage.’
“Kia’s directives circumvent this process entirely,” the associations said. “The mere presence of an aftermarket oil filter automatically voids warranty coverage for the oil change parts and services as well as any damage Kia says ‘relates’ to oil filter function.”
With this policy, the main loser is the consumer, who must pay extra for routine oil changes, according to the associations.
“While CR clearly should have done more to research this issue before publishing the article, the fact remains that the FTC failed to undertake its responsibilities under the law,” they said. “The absence of action by the commission is now cascading…into additional misinformation to consumers.”
The associations filed their FTC complaint against Kia on May 7, 2012. A year earlier, they made an identical complaint against American Honda Motor Co. for recommending only OEM filters when changing the oil in a Honda or Acura.
The FTC took no formal action against Honda, but it did issue an official consumer alert reminding consumers of their rights under the MMWA.
Titan International and the United Steelworkers union have petitioned the U.S. International Trade Commission and U.S. Department of Commerce seeking relief from OTR tire imports from China, India and Sri Lanka. What’s your opinion?
|I wholeheartedly support their action – something needs to be done.||
|I think it’s a bad idea that could inevitably tie the hands of domestic tire makers.||
|I oppose any duties against tire importers—they only raise costs for distributors and make it harder to obtain inventory.||
|I’m kind of on the fence and not sure what’s right, but need more information before deciding.||
|I don’t really care whether or not relief is granted.||
|Total votes: 78|