Current Issue

Tort reform advocate says Congress action unlikely

Comments Email

By Mark A. Hofmann, Crain News Service

WASHINGTON (March 13, 2014) — Enactment of substantive federal tort reform legislation may be a thing of the past, a prominent tort reform advocate said March 11.

Speaking at the American Tort Reform Association’s (ATRA) membership meeting in Washington, the group’s general counsel, Victor Schwartz, said future congressional action affecting tort law is likely to involve solely federal issues that are procedural.

An example is the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005, which placed certain interstate class actions in federal, rather than state, courts, he told the gathering of tort reform supporters.

Mr. Schwartz said most civil justice issues and tort law rules are addressed by state courts, with state legislatures coming in “on the periphery”—albeit on often significant issues such as limits on pain and suffering damages. Because tort law is primarily a state issue, substantive federal tort reform has been unusual.

He said a patent law reform measure passed in December by the U.S. House—the Innovation Act, H.R. 3309—does contain some civil justice reforms involving attorney fees, but a Senate measure dealing with patent issues does not.

If Republicans should gain a Senate majority in this year’s elections, legislation dealing with asbestos liability and “frivolous” lawsuits in federal courts could be revived, Mr. Schwartz said.

This report appeared on the website of Crain’s Business Insurance magazine, a Chicago-based sister publication of Tire Business.

More Polls>

TB Reader Poll

Previous | Published April 21, 2016

How often do you update your shop and/or business software?

Annually
23%
(21 votes)
Only when a substantial update is available
19%
(18 votes)
Every 2-4 years
14%
(13 votes)
Usually between 5 and 10 years
16%
(15 votes)
I hate it – as infrequently as possible
12%
(11 votes)
I never do – it’s too costly
16%
(15 votes)
Total votes: 93