WASHINGTON (March 10, 2014) — A proposed rule from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to improve tracking of workplace injuries and illnesses is fundamentally flawed and should not be promulgated in its current form, according to the Tire Industry Association (TIA).
“While TIA supports OSHA’s laudable goal of promoting safe and healthy working conditions for American workers, we would like to register our strong opposition to the rule as proposed and suggest that the agency withdraw the proposal,” TIA said in comments submitted to OSHA March 7.
The pending OSHA standard would require electronic submission of injury and illness data from employers, and also require various changes to the way the data are submitted.
Employers with 250 or more employees would have to submit injury and illness information quarterly, instead of annually as currently required.
OSHA issued the proposed rule last Nov. 8 and called for comments from interested parties. TIA was one of nearly 1,100 organizations, groups and individuals to submit comments on the document.
Both the methodology and the economic cost estimates of the rule are badly flawed, according to TIA.
“We do not see the advantage of increasing the burden on large employers by requiring quarterly reporting as opposed to the current annual requirements,” the association said. “Additionally, this data is highly sensitive and must be treated as confidential.”
While OSHA relied on legal precedent to determine that workplace injury and illness data are not confidential, those precedents are red herrings from the standpoint of this particular regulation, according to TIA.
“(T)he relevant policy question in terms of confidentiality is whether the raw injury and illness data, if published on a website, could be misused to the detriment of the employer supplying it and the extent to which information in this form is in fact useful to consumer decision making,” TIA said.
“We strongly believe that the nature of this data would be vulnerable to misuse by competitors and that it lacks the proper context to be a valuable tool for consumers,” it said.
OSHA also significantly underestimated the annual cost of compliance for companies with 250 or more employees, TIA claimed. Whereas the agency estimated compliance costs of $183 annually, the association estimated that a TIA members with 65 tire or auto service stores in multiple states would end up paying $2,064 annually for compliance with the rule.
Titan International and the United Steelworkers union have petitioned the U.S. International Trade Commission and U.S. Department of Commerce seeking relief from OTR tire imports from China, India and Sri Lanka. What’s your opinion?
|I wholeheartedly support their action – something needs to be done.||
|I think it’s a bad idea that could inevitably tie the hands of domestic tire makers.||
|I oppose any duties against tire importers—they only raise costs for distributors and make it harder to obtain inventory.||
|I’m kind of on the fence and not sure what’s right, but need more information before deciding.||
|I don’t really care whether or not relief is granted.||
|Total votes: 78|