Current Issue

Outgoing NHTSA chief Strickland to join D.C. law firm

Comments Email
(Crain News Service photo)
David Strickland

Crain News Service report

WASHINGTON (Jan. 9, 2014) — David Strickland, the outgoing administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), will join Venable L.L.P., a Washington corporate law firm, as a partner by the end of January, the firm said Jan. 8.

Mr. Strickland, 45, became the nation’s top auto safety regulator in early 2010. He announced his departure from NHTSA last month. He was a major player in the federal investigation into cases of alleged unintended acceleration in Toyota vehicles and in negotiating new fuel economy standards with the auto industry.

While at NHTSA, Mr. Strickland gave the agency a greater focus on advanced safety features that can prevent vehicle crashes. This year, the agency released the first guidelines for autonomous vehicles, as auto makers, suppliers and technology companies race to bring that technology to market.

Before becoming NHTSA administrator, Mr. Strickland spent eight years as senior counsel on the U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation.

No one has been nominated to succeed him at NHTSA. David Friedman, a fuel economy expert who worked at the advocacy group Union of Concerned Scientists before joining NHTSA earlier in 2013, was named acting administrator.

Venable focuses on corporate and business law and government affairs.

Mr. Strickland is expected to attend the Detroit auto show next week.

Reporter Gabe Nelson contributed to this report, which appeared on the website of Automotive News, a Detroit-based sister publication of Tire Business.

More Polls>

TB Reader Poll

Previous | Published January 28, 2016

Titan International and the United Steelworkers union have petitioned the U.S. International Trade Commission and U.S. Department of Commerce seeking relief from OTR tire imports from China, India and Sri Lanka. What’s your opinion?

I wholeheartedly support their action – something needs to be done.
46%
(36 votes)
I think it’s a bad idea that could inevitably tie the hands of domestic tire makers.
13%
(10 votes)
I oppose any duties against tire importers—they only raise costs for distributors and make it harder to obtain inventory.
24%
(19 votes)
I’m kind of on the fence and not sure what’s right, but need more information before deciding.
14%
(11 votes)
I don’t really care whether or not relief is granted.
3%
(2 votes)
Total votes: 78