Current Issue

Cooper, USW local agree to terms

Comments Email

FINDLAY, Ohio (Nov. 1, 2013) — Cooper Tire & Rubber Co. has reached tentative agreements with the union local representing workers at its Clarksdale, Miss., rubber compounding plant that Cooper said potentially could pave the way for the merger process with India's Apollo Tyres Ltd. to resume.

Details of the tentative agreements are not being disclosed pending review and consent by Apollo, Cooper said in an 8K statement posted with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The tentative labor agreements are also subject to review and ratification by union membership, Cooper said. The Clarksdale plant is represented by USW Local 556L.

The agreements are in response to a complaint filed by the USW on Aug. 1 claiming that Cooper's deal to be acquired by Apollo violated successorship clauses in the company's labor contracts with USW locals at Findlay, Ohio, and Texarkana, Ark.

The parties agreed to binding arbitration over the matter, and the arbitrator ruled in the union's favor Sept. 13. The arbitrator ruled that Cooper put the sale of its plants on hold until Apollo and the USW can agree on contracts covering about 2,500 USW members at Locals 752L in Texarkana and 207L in Findlay.

Cooper also said it has entered into a waiver agreement with the USW and the locals that "provides that the tentative labor agreements reached amongst Cooper Tire, the unions and USW Local 556L…will, in certain cases, satisfy the arbitrator's ruling so long as the merger closes on or before Nov. 18, 2013, even if such agreements are not yet ratified by union membership at that time," the filing said.

Cooper and Apollo are scheduled to face off in the Delaware Chancery Court starting Nov. 5 to settle a suit filed Oct. 4 by Cooper against Apollo seeking to force Apollo to complete the $35 a share merger offer the companies agreed to June 12.

More Polls>

TB Reader Poll

Previous | Published January 28, 2016

Titan International and the United Steelworkers union have petitioned the U.S. International Trade Commission and U.S. Department of Commerce seeking relief from OTR tire imports from China, India and Sri Lanka. What’s your opinion?

I wholeheartedly support their action – something needs to be done.
(36 votes)
I think it’s a bad idea that could inevitably tie the hands of domestic tire makers.
(10 votes)
I oppose any duties against tire importers—they only raise costs for distributors and make it harder to obtain inventory.
(19 votes)
I’m kind of on the fence and not sure what’s right, but need more information before deciding.
(11 votes)
I don’t really care whether or not relief is granted.
(2 votes)
Total votes: 78